This was shared by him on Valery Savchuk's author program "Different People."

Subscribe to our Viber: news, humor, and entertainment!

Subscribe

"By the way, the same 1000 hryvnias is, in principle, the right decision, but the design of this program is flawed. You cannot distribute such funds to everyone indiscriminately, as this money should only be allocated to socially vulnerable groups. Why pay someone who does not need this 1000 hryvnias?" - notes Alexey Kusch.

In fact, he claims, there are quite a number of people for whom the extra 1000 hryvnias are unnecessary, as during a crisis, which the war is, society experiences significant polarization. On one hand, the expert emphasizes, we see impoverished individuals, particularly internally displaced persons (IDPs), people who have lost their homes, jobs, and income, as well as pensioners.

"On the other hand, we observe the outrageous luxury of certain social groups. Records are being set for new car purchases at dealerships, and real estate, including elite properties abroad, is being bought. The number of wealthy individuals has increased from about 3% to 8% during the war; these are people with substantial financial resources," - shares Alexey Kusch.

Therefore, he states, there is no sense in paying 1000 hryvnias to a head of the TCC or the MSEC. Instead, he argues, these payments should be directed to pensioners, but not those who already receive 50,000 a month, IDPs, large families, and not just once but regularly, at least quarterly, while special programs need to be created for veterans.

Popular articles now Pensioners will face a new financial burden: expect no benefits There’s a condition, a 30-day limit is being introduced: what will happen to the electricity tariff from December 1 Plus 2361 UAH to the card monthly: who among pensioners will receive a substantial bonus in 2025 Dollars from "savings" may disappoint: new currency exchange rules are now in effect Show more

As reported by ZN.UA, Chalenko assessed the prospects for negotiations between Ukraine and Russia: "after Putin's death."

ZN.UA also wrote that Sheitelman explained why Trump's son is against ATACMS strikes on Russia.